User Address 1
User Address 2
User Address 3
User PostCode

9th January, 2010

Recorded Delivery
Tracking Number: ___________________

Protagonist Name
Protagonist Address 2
Protagonist Address 3
Protagonist PostCode

Dear Sirs,

Notice of Rejection for Cause, without Dishonour
Notice to Principal is Notice to Agent; Notice to Agent is Notice to Principal.

Regarding Reference: Reference or Account, your correspondence dated 15th January, 2009.

I am in receipt of a demand from your PRIVATE COMPANY, which I return to you. The reason is because you have not shown:

1. That I have any Contract with you, such as to LAWFULLY enforce any obligation on my part to do business with your company.

2.That I have breached any tenet of the Common Law (the Law-of-the-LAND) such as to have harmed anyone, caused them loss, breached the peace, or have been devious in my promises and agreements.

Unless, and until, you can show which facet of the Common Law I have breached, I reject your demand for cause, without any dishonour on my part.

You have as much 'authority' over me as any other PRIVATE COMPANY (actively trading for a profit), such as Tesco or Sainsbury's or Wal-Mart. In other words your company has no 'authority' that enables it to place any demands upon me without my express consent.

Put as simply as I am able: I do not wish to trade with your company.

You may consider that some Statute gives you the power to enforce demands on me. But a Statute is nothing more than "A Legislated Rule of a Society". And a Society is nothing more than "A group of like-minded individuals who come together to deliberate, determine, and act towards common goals". And it must have a Name (for Legal Fiction purposes), and must have published its "common goals" - such that individuals can determine whether or not they are "like-minded" - and, if so, to join the Society (become Members, and thus bound by the Society's Rules).

Thus before taking one more breath, your PRIVATE, LIMITED LIABILITY, COMPANY needs to prove that: The Society whose subsisting regulations you are attempting to enforce has a Name; Has published its "common goals"; That I, myself, applied for Membership (of my own free will, and not under any form of duress); That my Membership was accepted; And that I have not, subsequently, resigned any such Membership.

I should warn you that if you proceed to obtain a rubber-stamped Liability Order in your favour, then I will charge the amount of the liability PLUS an additional 50 for servicing any such Order. The servicing of Orders is chargeable by whomsoever provides the service. (For example, if your company Orders - say - stationery, then normal business practice would be to pay the suppliers at the rate they decide). To expect any Order to be serviced for nothing is business malpractice, blackmail, and extortion, by any other name (i.e. CRIMINAL - especially if accompanied by any 'menaces'). (You may choose your word from that list).

Thus I hereby give you notice that any further communications in this matter - which you have raised without my consent - will cause me to apply fees at the rates quoted below, for which - by contacting me further in this matter - you agree to be liable by 'performance':


   Telephonic conversations: 

   400/hour or part thereof.


   200 for each and every instance.


   200 for each and every instance.


   100/hour or part thereof.


If it should be necessary - due to your non-contractual insistence - for this matter to be raised in any future court, you agree to be liable to pay for my time away from home at 100/hour, plus travel, food and accommodation expenses.

Your PRIVATE, LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY, ACTIVELY TRADING AT A PROFIT IN ORDER TO PROVIDE A DIVIDEND FOR ITS SHAREHOLDERS, (and yes, that includes Police Forces), is so far out on a limb, there isn't even a tree.

Yours sincerely without ill-will, vexation or frivolity,

User: of the Signature family
Without any admission of any liability whatsoever, and with all Natural, Inalienable Human Rights reserved.